[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RTEMS vs. egcs-1.1a
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 10:00:19 -0500 (CDT)
- From: joel at OARcorp.com (joel at OARcorp.com)
- Subject: RTEMS vs. egcs-1.1a
On Mon, 7 Sep 1998, Chris Johns wrote:
> > * Joel's bit scripts don't work.
> It worked for me. I got the lastest from the beta3/c_tools directory,
> modified the user.cfg and off they went.
I think this reflects using binutils 2.9.1 rather than snapshots.
There is a problem lurking.
> > * Symlinking one-tree source-trees apparently doesn't seem work.
> The bit script uses links and it seemed to build. I have not built
> anything with the m68k compiler yet.
It tool about 20 hours but I built the following:
+ gdb 4.17
+ rtems current snapshot at the time
for all targets. I built sh-rtems and sh-rtemself with egcs-19980824.
> > FYI: The only reliable way to build the gnu-toolchain seems to be the
> way the > egcs' docs mention (Don't ask me where :-):
OK. I am curious where this is so the bit script can follow it.