bare bsps configurations to test

[cjohns at plessey.com.au (Chris Johns)]

joel at OARcorp.com wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 10 Sep 1998, Chris Johns wrote:
> 
> > > hand, there are a lot of CPU families and models for which the networking
> > > code is not compiled.
> > >
> >
> > ... and C++. For example not all target processors currently support
> > exceptions.
> 
> So am I right in hearing that from a testing completeness standpoint, I
> would be best to build the bare bsp for EVERY cpu model uniquely
> recognized by RTEMS with every piece of code --enabled and the tests
> --disabled.
> 

Yes. This would be a good test. I have a script based on your bit
script, which could be changed to read the processors and configuation
switches from a file and do the builds. I will look into this.

>
> This would be in addition to the build of all the BSPs and tests I already
> do.
> 

Yes. It would be nice if a BSP of each CPU type is built so any
linking issues can be checked for. For example the rtti problem only
showed when doing a link.

-- 
 Chris Johns  Networks, Plessey Asia Pacfic Pty. Ltd.
  mailto:ccj at acm.org    mailto:cjohns at plessey.com.au