bare bsps configurations to test

[joel at OARcorp.com (joel at OARcorp.com)]

On Fri, 11 Sep 1998, Chris Johns wrote:

> Yes. This would be a good test. I have a script based on your bit
> script, which could be changed to read the processors and configuation
> switches from a file and do the builds. I will look into this.

I have a script which cycles over all the configurations.  

Right now in bit_rtems, there are "pseudo-BSP names" for some bare bsps.
Search for bare-i486dx and bare-m68040.  I think all I need is replacement
for the case statement in here.  Then bit_rtems would know much more.  

> > This would be in addition to the build of all the BSPs and tests I already
> > do.
> 
> Yes. It would be nice if a BSP of each CPU type is built so any
> linking issues can be checked for. For example the rtti problem only
> showed when doing a link.

Right now, I build every BSP I can with at least the sample tests.  I do
this regularly on a linux host and plan to add a solaris host as soon as
everything is setup to do this on an automated basis. 

I would like to build with --enable-tests but the build time explodes as
does the disk space required.   

--joel