Patch for mcp750

[joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com (Joel Sherrill)]

Emmanuel Raguet wrote:
> 
> Hello everybody
> 
> After some tests on mcp750, I send this patch that correct
> the value of the minimum stack size for a task. It was too
> short and some problems occured. But it is now solved.
Any idea why the stack size has to be so big on the mcp750?

We have been abusing our local application based on a PPC603e 
and I have never needed this kind of stack usage.  Is it
something about the exception structure on the 750?

> 
> Regards.
> 
> -- Emmanuel
> 
>        |        Emmanuel RAGUET          |
>      _ | CANON CRF - Communication Dept. | _
>     / )|    Tel: +33(0)2 99 87 96 47     |( \
>    / / |    Fax: +33(0)2 99 84 11 30     | \ \
>  _( (_ |  _  http://www.crf.canon.fr  _  | _) )_
> (((\ \>|_/ )_________________________( \_|</ /)))
> (\\\\ \_/ /                           \ \_/ ////)
>  \       /                             \       /
>   \    _/                               \_    /
>   /   /                                   \   \
> 
>   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** cpu.h.old   Tue Aug 17 08:56:50 1999
> --- cpu.h       Tue Aug 17 08:45:04 1999
> ***************
> *** 543,549 ****
>    *  that a "reasonable" small application should not have any problems.
>    */
> 
> ! #define CPU_STACK_MINIMUM_SIZE          (1024*3)
> 
>   /*
>    *  CPU's worst alignment requirement for data types on a byte boundary.  This
> --- 543,549 ----
>    *  that a "reasonable" small application should not have any problems.
>    */
> 
> ! #define CPU_STACK_MINIMUM_SIZE          (1024*8)
> 
>   /*
>    *  CPU's worst alignment requirement for data types on a byte boundary.  This

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel at OARcorp.com                 On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available                (256) 722-9985