[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Need help to build RTMS 4.0
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 10:05:26 -0600
- From: mark.johannes at oarcorp.com (Mark Johannes)
- Subject: Need help to build RTMS 4.0
We are developing the ability to archive the list to the web. We hope to
have this capability soon to reduce the burden on the list to answer the
same and similar problems as they arise.
The hardest part of the "sourceware" industry is keeping abreast of the
multiple versions that everyone is using. We are aware that this is not
only a CM nightmare for us, but for the users as well. OAR will strive to
produce guidelines to support this ever changing environment, but at times
we will miss the some configuration. It is our hope that the user community
will assist us in determining these problems and correct them as quickly as
Thank you for all your support and let's keep improving and evolving
From: owner-rtems-list at oarcorp.com [mailto:owner-rtems-list at oarcorp.com] On
Behalf Of Charles Gauthier
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 1999 8:40 AM
To: rtems-list at oarcorp.com
Subject: Re: Need help to build RTMS 4.0
VALETTE Eric wrote:
> >>>>> "dyliu" == dyliu <dyliu at tc.silkera.net> writes:
> dyliu> Hi,
> dyliu> Hunk #1 FAILED at 174.
> dyliu> Hunk #2 FAILED at 308.
> dyliu> Hunk #3 FAILED at 436.
> dyliu> Hunk #4 FAILED at 490.
> dyliu> Hunk #5 FAILED at 504.
> dyliu> 5 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to bfd/config.bfd.rej
> dyliu> patching file `binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp'
> dyliu> ....
> dyliu> The applying of patches to egcs and newlib also creates .rej files.
> dyliu> When I run the bit script, it does not successfully complete.
> dyliu> Any suggestion?
> Yes but you may dislike them. I have recently also experienced problems
> with patches that did not apply cleanly and this is not specific to RTEMS
> but rather to the CVS, diffutils and the various patch versions.
> I would strongly recommend you to upgrade to patch version 2.5.3.
> At least it fixed many problems I was facing in the past.
> FYI : I have also recommended OAR to upgrade their CVS version to
> 1.10.4 as some "patch" bugs have been removed that prevent to
> work around old CVS version diff command output bugs (that have also
> been removed now).
> / ` Eric Valette
> /-- __ o _. Canon CRF
> (___, / (_(_(__ Rue de la touche lambert
> 35517 Cesson-Sevigne Cedex
> Tel: +33 (0)2 99 87 68 91 Fax: +33 (0)2 99 84 11 30
> E-mail: valette at crf.canon.fr
I had similar problems using the patch program that comes with Solaris 2.5.
had to install the GNU patch program, version 2.5.
To OAR: hopefully, you are collecting these types of tidbits and will
the documentation. I am willing to help with the documentation, to the best
my ability and knowledge.
A searchable archive of the posts to the mailing list would also be
Software Engineering Group
Institute for Information Technology
National Research Council of Canada
Ottawa, ON, Canada