[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 13:02:56 -0600 (CST)
- From: joel at OARcorp.com (joel at OARcorp.com)
- Subject: C++ support
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, D. V. Henkel-Wallace wrote:
> At 12:38 24-02-99 -0600, joel at oarcorp.com wrote:
> >On 24 Feb 1999, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >If C++ is enabled, should the make rules automatically handle linking the
> >application against libstdc++?
> >Whether we use g++ to link or gcc/-lstdc++ is not important. All that is
> >important is whether or not the make-exe rules should cover this library.
> I think it is always safe to use the C++ compiler to invoke the linker. To
> do so would be more portable for those users potentially not using GNU.
Ralf ... :) comments please ..
Ralf has been working on making RTEMS more compliant with the standard GNU
autoconf/automake rules for building. This is up his alley right now. :)
- C++ support
- From: gumby at zembu.com (D. V. Henkel-Wallace)