[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 15:45:08 -0700
- From: dtalayco at broadcom.com (Daniel Talayco)
- Subject: autoheader problem
The problem occurred after applying the patch. In fact I thought it was b/c of the patch. I've had some clock skew problems, but that seems unlikely in this case.
Anyway, I broke down and installed autoconf (and M4) locally just in case....
Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Daniel Talayco wrote:
> > Hi--
> > I don't know if this is a common problem (I didn't have it installing 4.0.0) but I had it trying to compile the tools for 4.5.0beta3. Running bit, I hit
> > cd ../../gcc-2.95.2/gcc && autoheader
> > /bin/sh: autoheader: not found
> > gmake: *** [../../gcc-2.95.2/gcc/cstamp-h.in] Error 1
> > gmake: Leaving directory `/export/home/det/tools/build-powerpc-tools/gcc'
> > gmake: *** [all-gcc] Error 2
> > ERROR: **** FAILED **** base build (step 1)
> > I think I found a solution in the gcc (egcs) mail archives:
> > find . -name configure -print | xargs touch
> > Judging from the solution (and message), I take it that the patch makes the makefile think that configure needs to be regenerated using autoconf (and that autoheader is a part of that).
> > I'm assuming that the configuration files do NOT need to be regenerated; if someone knows otherwise, please correct me (and send me to an autoconf distribution).
> Is this before or after applying the RTEMS patch? The
> patch should be modifying configure AFTER configure.in.
> Maybe this is not enough to satisfy the timestamp check
> in make. :(
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
> joel at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
> Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
> Support Available (256) 722-9985