[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
mcpu32 instead of mcpu32+ ?
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:16:47 -0600
- From: eric.norum at usask.ca (Eric Norum)
- Subject: mcpu32 instead of mcpu32+ ?
Ilya Alexeev wrote:
> Hi all.
> To gen68360 users and RTEMS developers:
> I am use gen68360 bsp & last RTEMS snapshot, and the
> _RTEMS_version string contains "mcpu32" instead
> of "mcpu32+" ?
> Also all defines are enabled for MCPU32, but not for MCPU32+ (in m68k.h)
> Does anybody know how to correct it?
This is kind of strange. The #define RTEMS__mcpu32p__ 1 is in
it doesn't seem to be getting used, since M68K_HAS_MISALIGNED is not
getting defined to be 1 as it should. Should m68k.h be modified to
The effect of this error won't be huge -- the only place that
M68K_HAS_MISALIGNED is used is in m68k/memcpy.c.
Eric Norum eric.norum at usask.ca
Department of Electrical Engineering Phone: (306) 966-5394
University of Saskatchewan FAX: (306) 966-5407