Improvements to DOSFS

[cjohns at cybertec.com.au (Chris Johns)]

Eugeny Mints wrote:
> 
> Unfortunately, yes. Of course, I had understood (and understand:) how it
> is ugly:(. Of course, it was temporary stub which I was going to improve
> as soon as possible - but you know: there are no more constant things
> than temporary:) So, of course it is necessary to implement some
> extendible (at run time) pool of buffers "for ata requests" with
> predefined initial size: then
> 
> areq = malloc(sizeof(ata_req_t));
> 
> will look like:
> 
> areq = get_buf_from_ata_req_pool();
> 

Thanks for the response. I understand the issues when getting things going and 
wanted to know if this is something that we need to look into.

-- 
  Chris Johns, cjohns at cybertec.com.au