GSOC Replies

[cquark at gmail.com (Wei Shen)]

Hi,

On 3/25/08, x ray <rayx.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agreed with Joel because (1)not try to introduce big change at one
> time (2) each milestone is reachable (3)when each milestone achieved,
> user's application will not break.
>
> The drawback is, there might be some duplicate job.
>
> Wei, what is your opinion ?


I totally agree. As I already noted, I will not add VFS implementation to
the GSoC proposal, but I would like to add "a survey of VFS implementation
based on IMFS" as a task.

On 3/25/08, Wei Shen <cquark at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> If people of RTEMS trust me, I would like to make it a long term plan, but
> at current stage, I feel I am not experienced enough to undertake that.
>
> Redesign FS infrastructure for an OS is really a serious task, though in
> RTEMS, IMFS and jnode provide a good start point - they in fact accomplish
> lots of work the VFS layer does. Maybe, after sufficient work on FIFO, file
> descriptor, and aio, I will be more comfident of trying.
>

Regrards,
Wei Shen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rtems.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-users/attachments/20080325/1087a815/attachment.html