[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:47:33 -0500
- From: joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com (Joel Sherrill)
- Subject: GSOC Replies
Wei Shen wrote:
> On 3/25/08, *x ray* <rayx.cn at gmail.com <mailto:rayx.cn at gmail.com>> wrote:
> I agreed with Joel because (1)not try to introduce big change at one
> time (2) each milestone is reachable (3)when each milestone achieved,
> user's application will not break.
> The drawback is, there might be some duplicate job.
> Wei, what is your opinion ?
> I totally agree. As I already noted, I will not add VFS implementation
> to the GSoC proposal, but I would like to add "a survey of VFS
> implementation based on IMFS" as a task.
That sounds safe. You could have a design and direction. Maybe you get
and maybe you don't. You have tasks ahead of it. :)
> On 3/25/08, *Wei Shen* <cquark at gmail.com <mailto:cquark at gmail.com>>
> If people of RTEMS trust me, I would like to make it a long term
> plan, but at current stage, I feel I am not experienced enough to
> undertake that.
> Redesign FS infrastructure for an OS is really a serious task,
> though in RTEMS, IMFS and jnode provide a good start point - they
> in fact accomplish lots of work the VFS layer does. Maybe,
> after sufficient work on FIFO, file descriptor, and aio, I will be
> more comfident of trying.
> Wei Shen
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985