[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
An initial proposal for review
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:58:23 -0600
- From: daron.chabot at usask.ca (Daron Chabot)
- Subject: An initial proposal for review
Madhusudan C.S wrote:
> Hi Joel, Daron and all,
Comments/corrections to proposal:
-- paragraph 3 - "...providing methods separate methods..."
-- 1st line of page 3 - "corresponding to each of the implementation."
"implementation" should be plural.
-- 1st and 2nd points - "Baseline Testing" and "baseline testing"
-- only use "baseline testing"
-- 2nd point - "Algorithms" should not be capitalized
-- 4th point - omit the word "currently"
-- 5th point - "implementation of new class" should be "implementation
of the new class."
-- 7th point - your first sentence is awkward. In the last sentence,
"how to" should be "how-to".
-- 8th point - punctuation at the end (comma and period)
On a general note, I'm not sure that the object-oriented terminology
(class, abstract class, methods) is strictly correct in the context of
RTEMS development. Sure OO ideas are prevalent in RTEMS, but there is no
innate support for those concepts from the development tools.
Just a thought... :-)
Looks good, though... well done !