Bug found

[Thomas.Doerfler at embedded-brains.de (Thomas Dörfler)]

Leon,

you are right, the meaning of "clocks_per_usec" may be missleading. But
the bus clock is not the CPU (execution) clock either. Since the 603 has
a CPU internal PLL, the CPU clock is in most cases a (fractional)
multiple of the bus clock. So maybe we should simply add some lines of
comment to the usage of this constant on PPC.

wkr,
Thomas.


Leon Pollak wrote:
> On Tuesday June 9 2009, Thomas D?rfler wrote:
>> Leon,
>>
>> the big question is, what is the definition of "clocks per usec". In
>> your view, this is the bus clock, in the view implemented, it is the
>> Timebase/DEC tick rate directly.
>>
>> Maybe this helps...
> Thomas,
> As all what you say, this definitely helps...:-))
> 
> Just, don't you think that the name of the variable is mistaking?
> 
> I understand "CPU clocks per usec" as the number of input frequency ticks in 
> one micro second. 
> 
> How one can guess that it should be timebase clock AFTER prescaler?
> 
> But many thanks as usual...:-)


-- 

--------------------------------------------
Embedded Brains GmbH
Thomas Doerfler        Obere Lagerstrasse 30
D-82178 Puchheim       Germany
email: Thomas.Doerfler at embedded-brains.de
Phone: +49-89-18908079-2
Fax:   +49-89-18908079-9