[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RTEMS_DEBUG
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:43:45 -0800 (PST)
- From: e_leontie at yahoo.com (Leontie Eugen)
- Subject: RTEMS_DEBUG
Sorry for being vague. I am doing a RTEMS port to sparc64, so I have a new processor model, new bsp and the rtems is the latest CVS from a couple weeks back.
I found this conversation online : http://old.nabble.com/-patch,rtems--Don't-build-__assert_func-for-RTEMS-td25554127.html
and it is exactly what I need. Can you explain how should I configure NEWLIB for that, or how would I activate HAVE___ASSERT_FUNC ?
Eugen
--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius at rtems.org> wrote:
> From: Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius at rtems.org>
> Subject: Re: RTEMS_DEBUG
> To: "Leontie Eugen" <e_leontie at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "RTEMS" <rtems-users at rtems.org>
> Date: Friday, November 6, 2009, 4:29 AM
> On 11/05/2009 09:35 PM, Leontie Eugen
> wrote:
> > If I compile rtems with -DRTEMS_DEBUG as gcc
> parameter, I get some __assert compilation/link errors (
> both RTEMS and NEWLIB seems to have them defined ).
> No, RTEMS_DEBUG is an RTEMS-only thing. Newlib doesn't use
> it.
>
> > Do I need to recompile my toolchain in some mode to
> get rid of this error ?
> No. RTEMS_DEBUG is a only used inside of RTEMS.
>
> Unfortunately, your report doesn't contain sufficient
> details to be able to provide further help (Which RTEMS
> version, which target, which BSP, which configuration, where
> does the error occur, ...)
>
> Ralf
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- RTEMS_DEBUG
- From: ralf.corsepius at rtems.org (Ralf Corsepius)
- References:
- RTEMS_DEBUG
- From: ralf.corsepius at rtems.org (Ralf Corsepius)