AW: GUI Libraries, Frame Buffer and Input Devices

[sebastien at milkymist.org (Sébastien Bourdeauducq)]

On Tuesday 14 December 2010 12:48:30 Johannes Schock wrote:
> You can do advertisement for your project as much as you like, but
> spreading comments like
> 
> >> Microwindows, Nano-X, nxlib... the X11 sandwich: layers of crap make
> >> good
> >> 
> >> food? ;-)
> >> 
> >> Nano-X demos = jokes
> 
> is not the way you keep a discussion objective. It's more like spreading
> FUD against a commercial opponent.

No, it is not.

First, I'm not at all into GUI business, and I have little, if any, interest 
in it. The MTK project is something I didn't like to do, but had to be done, 
because sadly there was no acceptable open source solution to my embedded GUI 
needs.

And it's just fair to call this a joke:
http://www.microwindows.org/SSWin32.html
when there are embedded GUIs which look like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2Hz8dhQw8Q

Acknowledging the problem and calling things what they are is working towards 
a solution, and not FUD at all.

S.