[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks

Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:54:09 +1100
From: chrisj at rtems.org (Chris Johns)
Subject: Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks

On 2/19/2010 11:31 AM, Eric Norum wrote:
> The patch looks like a good idea, but even without it I think that it's safe
 > to have the other task perform a socket shutdown which will then 
cause the
> read in the first task to return an error, right?

I am not sure. I cannot remember if I tried the shutdown call. I seem to 
remember there being a problem but I am not sure what it was. I know an 
accept and close was a problem.

> The first task would then  take care of closing the socket itself.

Yes if the shutdown works.

Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
  - From: dufault at hda.com (Peter Dufault)

References:
- Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
  - From: peerst at gmail.com (Peer Stritzinger)
- Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
  - From: chrisj at rtems.org (Chris Johns)
- Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
  - From: wenorum at lbl.gov (Eric Norum)

Prev by Date: Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
Next by Date: PCIe
Previous by thread: Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
Next by thread: Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread