[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks

Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:32:11 +1100
From: chrisj at rtems.org (Chris Johns)
Subject: Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks

On 20/02/2010 6:14 AM, Eric Norum wrote:
> Based on a quick look through the code in kern/uipc_socket.c I'm pretty sure that shutting down a socket from one thread is a safe way to break another thread out of a socket read.
>

Great.

> FWIW, EPICS IOCs that use the 'shutdown from another thread' mechanism have been running for literally years with neither a reboot nor any apparent problems.....
>

I have updated the patch in the PR to 4.10. If it is ok I would like to 
commit for 4.10.

Can users with high network load type applications please be able to 
test and update the PR ?

Thanks
Chris

References:
- Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
  - From: peerst at gmail.com (Peer Stritzinger)
- Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
  - From: chrisj at rtems.org (Chris Johns)
- Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
  - From: wenorum at lbl.gov (Eric Norum)
- Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
  - From: chrisj at rtems.org (Chris Johns)
- Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
  - From: dufault at hda.com (Peter Dufault)
- Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
  - From: WENorum at lbl.gov (Eric Norum)

Prev by Date: clock_get_uptime
Next by Date: clock_get_uptime
Previous by thread: Question about Socket fd access in multiple tasks
Next by thread: Recent rtems-4.10 GCC updates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread