Re: PC386 boot problems (solved)

["VALETTE Eric" <valette@crf.canon.fr>]

>>>>> "Quality" == Quality Quorum <qqi@world.std.com> writes:

Quality> On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, VALETTE Eric wrote:
Quality> This loop is called once during start up, so the the point should be 
Quality> a reliable minimum delay time (this one will give you 1us on 1Gz
Quality> processor), versus precision achived through a strange trick.

>> Could the guy that suggested the change test with 0x80?

Quality> The problem I found was that start16.s does not have enough delay
Quality> time while doing Gate 20 operation. I just changed ldsegs.s along 
Quality> same lines, hence '%'.

Proabbly untested since it does not compile...

Furthermore :

   1) Linux does otherwyse and has been much more tested than RTEMS on pc386
   2) Your loop does not work on our PC...


-- eric